tg-me.com/noorrgh2000/22926
Last Update:
🤍🫶
BY :)
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/Lll7nWRzXmXJGxhBpt550reoPN5Pnbz1IlBoXFA06S8mXeMNgimZjtXpdAhilW_AFh4IQm2XamNMElm95-r435ZuCHVW8oyn8wKTG4pHF2W1fesPn3QI-bC4tzZ0smFTGk-LNucHQ87d7K5mBotXdx4sdN36YlchXOKE4P532-Sjq3liWcFjq2k6f2Tvur-0g2gabyzKBpopKJtKqhIph2_vxdI8wphRwkFrxJZfxmo96x1dWxv-iWb75V35PJDyGFh3FqLiKmK5G58fZvLlvOYCHCv2P0LSxlB2-FeRE4LjIKjw2W8nuZFwOKbI9WWEwFhsvaEnuk7NwTSsegRrYA.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/noorrgh2000/22926
🤍🫶
BY :)
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
: from kr